Table of Contents

West Mek

Timothy Usher, Santa Fe Institute

Situation

[under construction]

The West Mek family consists of six languages spoken …

Subclassification

The internal classification of West Mek is as follows:

West Mek

Eipo

Nalca

Nipsan

Kosarek

Sela

Kimyal

Heeschen (…¬) states that Nipsan is a dialect of Kosarek Yale; however … and his own lexicostatistical figures (below) …

Phonologically, Kimyal (Korapun, Koropun) stands apart from the others in having failed to change medial /*s/ to /h/ with consequent initial cluster and diphthong formation (below,) however lexically and grammatically does not stand out as unique.

Heeschen (1978: 9) provides lexicostatistical figures for West Mek languages as follows:

Eipo Nalca Nipsan Kosarek Korapun
Eipo 77.91 74.29 70.41 75.76
Nalca 77.91 84.85 79.07 81.25
Nipsan 74.29 84.85 79.41 81.82
Kosarek 70.41 79.07 79.41 78.79
Korapun 75.76 81.25 81.82 78.79

No figures for Sela are available.

It will be noted that the figures for Eipo are significantly lower than those between other West Mek languages. The reason for this is because Eipo’s vocabulary has been largely replaced by that of a near-relative of Una in the East Mek family. Indeed, many to most of the roots which are cognate to West Mek forms reflect their East Mek versions with East Mek correspondences.

Sources

[under construction]

Historical phonology

[under construction]










…:

West MekKimyalSela Kosarek Nipsan Nalca Hamnggona
Young GodschalkHeeschenWälchliWälchliRule
*…
*…

Pronouns

West Mek free pronouns are reconstructed as follows, with Kimyal attestations drawn from Young (1986,) Sela from Godschalk (1984,) Kosarek from Heeschen (1992: 16, ibid,) Nispan from Wälchli (2019,) Nalca from Svärd (2013: 26-27, cf. Rule, Rule and Cutting 1972: 37) and Eipo from …:

West MekKimyal Sela Kosarek Nipsan Nalca Eipo
Young GodschalkHeeschen WälchliSvärd Heeschen
1 sg.*na na na-da n̪a na na-ra na
2 sg.*an àn an-da an̪ an an-da an
3 sg.*ɛl al ? ɛl el al-da ɛl
1 pl.*nu[n] nun; nùn [incl.]? n̪u(n̪) nun nun-da nʊn
2 pl.*an-kun aʔun haᵘn-da ʕaᵘn̪ aᵘn ugun-daaŋʊn
3 pl.*sik sik ? s̪ik-in̪ ~ s̪i-n̪sik sik-da sɪk

Kosarek third person plural /s̪in̪/ is a reduction of an originally possessive form /*sik-in/ (cf. Nipsan /sigin/.)

From Sela and Nalca a paradigm can be reconstructed which Svärd (2013: 26-27) labels nominative:

West Mek Sela Nalca
GodschalkSvärd
1 sg. nom.*na-da na-da na-ra
2 sg. nom.*an-da an-da an-da
3 sg. nom.*ɛl-da ? al-da
1 pl. nom.*nun-da ? nun-da
2 pl. nom *an-kun-dahaᵘn-da ugun-da
3 pl. nom.*sik-da ? sik-da

From Kosarek and Nalca an ergative/possessive paradigm can be reconstructed which is found also in (at least) Una of the East Mek family (q.v. Louwerse 1988: 72-75, 106-114;) in Nalca these are followed by the augment /a/:

West Mek Kosarek Nalca
Heeschen Svärd
1 sg. erg./poss.*na-di n̪a-d̪i na-dʲ-a
2 sg. erg./poss.*an-di an̪-d̪i an-dʲ-a
3 sg. erg./poss.*ɛl-di ɛl-d̪i al-dʲ-a
1 pl. erg./poss.*nun-di n̪u-d̪i nun-dʲ-a
2 pl. erg./poss.*an-kun-diʕaᵘn̪-d̪i ugun-dʲ-a
3 pl. erg./poss.*sik-di s̪i-n̪-d̪isik-dʲ-a

It would seem that /*-di/ was really an cnclitic rather than a bound suffix, as it attaches also to the Kosarek third person plural which reflects /*sik-in/ rather than /*sik/ (above.)

Svärd gives several other case paradigms for Nalca which may well date to proto-West Mek, but these are not exemplified for other West Make languages.

Verbal morphology

[under construction]

… with Kimyal attestations drawn from Young (1986,) Sela from Gosdchalk (1984,) Kosarek from Heeschen (1992-27-28,) Hmanggona (Nalca) from Rule, Rule and Cutting (1972: 16, 30, 38-49, 58-59, 62b, cf. Svärd 2013: 12-15) and Eipo from Heeschen (1978: 28, 1998: 257-258.)

…:

…present/future …:

West Mek Kimyal Sela Kosarek HmanggonaEipo
Young GodschalkHeeschen Rule Heeschen
1 sg. pres./fut.*-n -n ~ -n-a-n-a -n̪ ~ -n̪-a-n ~ -n-a-n ~ -n-ɛ
2 sg. pres./fut.*-lam -lam ? -lam -lam -lam
3 sg. pres./fut.*-l -l ~ -l-a-l-a -l ~ -l-a -l ~ -l-a-l ~ -l-ɛ
1 pl. pres./fut.*-ap -ap ? -ap -ap -ap
2 pl. pres./fut.*-lo̝m ? -lɔm -lɔm -lum -lʊm
3 pl. pres./fut.*-a[ŋ/k] -aŋ ? -aŋ -ak -ak
1 dl. pres./fut.*-nam -nam ? -n̪am -nam -nam
2 dl. pres./fut.*-d-om -d-om -d-ɔm -d̪-ɔm -rum -d-ʊm
3 dl. pres./fut.*-d-a[ŋ/k]-d-aŋ -d-aŋ -d̪-aŋ -r-ak -d-ak

… hortative/future …:

West Mek Kimyal Sela Kosarek Hmanggona Eipo
Young GodschalkHeeschen Rule Heeschen
1 sg. hort./fut.*-nu-n -nu-n ? -n̪u-n̪ -nu-n -nu-n; [-nʲ-am]
2 sg. hort./fut.*-lu-lam -l-ɔm ? lu-lam -l-ɔm -lʲ-am
3 sg. hort./fut.*-lu-l -lu-l ? -lu-l -lu-l -lu-l
1 pl. hort./fut.*-nu-ap [-g-ɔp] [-k-ɔp] [-uk-ap] -n-op -nʲ-ap
2 pl. hort./fut.*-lu-lo̝m -lu-lum ? -lu-lɔm -lu-lum -lu-lʊm
3 pl. hort./fut.*-nu-a[k/ŋ] [-g-ɔŋ] ? [-uk-aŋ] -n-ok -nʲ-ak
1 dl. hort./fut.*-nu-nam -n-ɔm -n-ɔm -n̪u-n̪am -n-ɔm -nʊ-nam
~-nʲ-anam
2 dl. hort./fut.*-du-d-o̝m -du-r-um ? -d̪u-d̪-ɔm -du-r-um
-~ -ru-r-um
-ɾu-ɾ-ʊm
[-d-ʊm]
3 dl. hort./fut.*-du-d-a[k/ŋ][-d-ug-ɔŋ]? [-d̪-uk-aŋ]-ru-r-uk -du-ɾ-ak
~ -ɾu-ɾ-ak



From Kimyal, Sela and Kosarek Yale can be reconstructed an alternate future parqdigm we designate here as future II. This paradigm has a probable analog in East Mek. Baesd upon West Mek languages alone, only three persons can be reconstructed for this paradigm:

West Mek Kimyal Sela Kosarek
Young GodschalkHeeschen
1 pl. fut. II*-ug-ap -g-ɔp -k-ɔp -uk-ap
3 pl. fut. II*-ug-a[ŋ/k] -g-ɔŋ ? -uk-aŋ
3 dl. fut. II*-d-ug-a[ŋ/k]-d-ug-ɔŋ? -d̪-uk-aŋ

… recent past …

West Mek KimyalKosarek HmanggonaEipo
Young HeeschenRule Heeschen
1 sg. rec. past*-n-o̝ -n-o -n̪-ɔ -n-o -n-ʷ-ɛ
2 sg. rec. past*-o̝m-o̝ -om -ɔm -om -ʊm
3 sg. rec. past*-Ø-o̝ -o -o -w-ɛ ~ -ɔ
1 pl. rec. past*-o̝p-o̝ -op -ɔb-ɔ -up -ʊp-ɛ ~ -p-ɛ
2 pl. rec. past*-lo̝m-o̝ ? [-ɔm] -lum -lʊm
3 pl. rec. past*-o̝ŋ-o̝ -ɔŋ -ɔŋ -oŋ -ʊŋ ~ -ʊŋ-ɛ
1 dl. rec. past*-no̝m-o̝ -nom -n̪ɔm-ɔ -num -nʊmʷ-ɛ
2 dl. rec. past*-d-o̝m-o̝-dom -d̪-ɔm -r-um -d-ʊm ~ -ɾ-ʊm
3 dl. rec. past*-d-o̝ŋ-o̝? -d̪-ɔŋ -r-oŋ -d-ʊŋ ~ -ɾ-ʊŋ

… remote past …:

West MekKimyalSela Kosarek HmanggonaEipo
Young GodschalkHeeschen Rule Heeschen
1 sg. rem. past*-si -si -si ~ -hi-s̪i ~ -hi-s-a -s-ɛ
2 sg. rem. past*-lum-u -lum ? -lum -lum -lʊm
3 sg. rem. past*-o̝k -ok ? -ɔk -ok -ʊk
1 pl. rem. past*-up-u -up ? -ub-u -up -ʊp-ɛ
2 pl. rem. past*-lum-u -lum ? -lum -lum -lʊm
3 pl. rem. past*-e̝k -ek ? -ɛk -ek -ɪk
1 dl. rem. past*-num-u -num ? -n̪um-u -num -nʊm
2 dl. rem. past*-d-um-u-d-um ? -d̪-um -r-um -d-ʊm
3 dl. rem. past*-d-e̝k -d-ek ? -d̪-ɛk -r-ek -d-ɪk

… potential/optative …:

West Mek Kosarek HmanggonaEipo
Heeschen Rule Heeschen
1 sg. pot./opt.*-te̝-n-e̝ -s̪ɛ-n̪-ɛ ~ -h… -si-n-ʲ-a-tɪ-n-ʲ-ɛ
2 sg. pot./opt.*-t-o̝m -s̪-ɔm ~ -h-ɔm [-si-lim]-t-ʊm
3 sg. pot./opt.*-t-Ø-o̝ -s̪-ɔ ~ -h-ɔ -si-Ø -t-ʷ-ɛ ~ -t-ɔ
1 pl. pot./opt.*-te̝-b-e̝ -s̪ɛ-b-ɛ ~ -h… -si-b-ʲ-a-tɛ-ⁱb-ʲ-ɛ
2 pl. pot./opt.*-t-o̝m -s̪-ɔm ~ -h-ɔm [-si-lum]-t-ʊm
3 pl. pot./opt.*-te̝-ŋ-[e̝] -s̪ɛ-ŋ ~ -hɛ-ŋ -si-ŋ -tɪ-ŋ
1 dl. pot./opt.*-te̝-ne̝m-e̝ -s̪ɛ-n̪ɛm-ɛ ~-h… -si-nim -tɛ-nɪm-ʲ-ɛ
2 dl. pot./opt.*-tV-d-o̝m -s̪ɛ-d̪-ɔm
~ -hɛ-d̪-ɔm
-si-r-um -tʊ-ɾ-ʊm
~ -tɛ-ɾ-ʊm
3 dl. pot./opt.*-te̝-d-e̝ŋ-[e̝]-s̪ɛ-d̪-ɛŋ ~ -h… -si-r-iŋ -tɛ-ɾ-ɪŋ

… medial sequential …

West Mek Kosarek HmanggonaEipo
Heeschen Rule Heeschen
1 sg. med. seq.*-n-e̝ -n̪-ɛ -n-e-a -n-ʲ-ɛ
2 sg. med. seq.*-me̝n -mɛn̪ -men -mɪn
3 sg. med. seq.*-l-e̝ -l-ɛ -l-e-a -l-ʲ-ɛ
1 pl. med. seq.*-e̝p-e̝ -b-ɛ -b-e-a -ɛⁱb-ʲ-ɛ
2 pl. med. seq.*-mun -mun -mun -mʊn
3 pl. med. seq.*-e̝k-e̝ -ɛk -ik-ʲ-a -ɪk
1 dl. med. seq.*-ne̝m-e̝ -n̪ɛm-ɛ -nim -nɪm-ʲ-ɛ~-nɛm-ɛ
2 dl. med. seq.*du-mun -d̪u-mun̪-ru-mun -dʊ-mɪn
~ -dʊ-mʊn
3 dl. med. seq.*-d-e̝k-e̝-d̪-ɛk -r-ik-ʲ-a-d-ɪk

Young gives several suffixes which are said to occur with /wenena/ “when?” and have no tense. These look like medial sequential forms except that the second persons are not replaced by the suppletive /*-me̝n *-mun/, and can be connected with several idiosyncratic Hmanggona desiderative (potential/optative) forms to reconstruct an original more regular paradigm from which both the medial sequentials and the potential/optatives largely derive:

West Mek KimyalHmanggona
Young Rule
1 sg.*-n-e̝ -n-e -nʲ-a
2 sg.*-le̝m-e̝ -lem -lim
3 sg.? ?
1 pl.*-e̝p-e̝ ? -bʲ-a
2 pl.? ? -lum
3 pl.*-e̝[ŋ/k]-e̝ -ik -iŋ
1 dl.*-ne̝m-e̝ -nem -nim
2 dl.? ? -r-um
3 dl.*-d-e̝[ŋ/k]-e̝? -r-iŋ

An imperative paradigm is sporadically attested for a few persons as follows. Heeschen’s Kosarek Yale forms are prefixed with the continuative aspect marker /-lam-/. It seems probable that final /*d/ is the same morpheme found in the duals above:

West MekKimyalKosarek Eipo
Young Heeschen Heeschen
2 sg.*-[i/e̝]-i
1 pl.? ? -lam-ku-d̪ ?
2 pl.*-su -su ? -s-ɛ [2 sg.]
1 dl.*-du-d -du-d -lam-d̪u-d̪ ?
2 dl.*-su-d -su-d -lam-s̪u-d̪ [2 pl.]?

West MekKimyalSela Kosarek HmanggonaEipo
Young GodschalkHeeschenRule Heeschen
1 sg.*…
2 sg.*…
3 sg.*…
1 pl.*…
2 pl.*…
3 pl.*…
1 dl.*…
2 dl.*…
3 dl.*…